In Chapter 20 of Teaching the Neglected R, Smith searched for an explanation for why boys frequently underperform girls, especially in writing. I like when Smith quotes Newkirk by writing, “the kind of literary work that boys find most pleasurable is undervalued in school: jokes, comic books, adventure stories, and so on” (244). Wouldn’t a multi-genre paper allow both boys and girls to explore these other, less traditional genres of writing?? If we had students participate in a multi-genre paper, perhaps boys would be more interested in writing because they can incorporate their own interests.
I was a little surprised by the quotes from boy students who said that they only enjoy doing things that they felt competent doing. We as teachers need to show them they are competent in writing! Allowing them to have practice without constantly being assessed or criticized will give them motivation and a feeling of competence.
I was also shocked to see that “providing rubrics or model texts…isn’t the answer” (247). We have learned over and over again that these are successful methods! However, as I read on, I began to understand that students must first learn the skills and learn how to do something. Then, I think, students will benefit from rubrics and models because they understand the process that takes them to that success.
Stacia